.png)
Last updated: August 6, 2026
"I think the majority of people don't enjoy the majority of the time they spend making music... it's not really enjoyable to make music now. It takes a lot of time, it takes a lot of practice, you need to get really good at an instrument or really good at a piece of production software." Mikey Shulman, CEO of Suno, on the 20VC podcast, January 2025
Shulman later told Billboard he wished he'd "chosen different words." Fair, but the quote is a useful window into how the company that trained its model on millions of copyrighted recordings sees the thing it copied: not as work worth protecting, just friction worth automating away.
The labels, publishers, and collecting societies disagree, and they've been proving it in court across two continents. Below is every active or recently resolved AI-music-generator lawsuit we're tracking, with sources for each. We'll keep this updated as rulings land.
Suno & Udio vs. the major labels (United States)
RIAA v. Suno — Sony Music & Universal Music (D. Mass.) Status: Active, summary-judgment hearing held July 2026 before Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV. Audio fingerprinting evidence showed Suno trained on millions of copyrighted recordings; in May 2026 the labels moved to add 61,026 more recordings to the case after discovery. This is the case most likely to set the first major US "is training AI on copyrighted music fair use" precedent. Sources: Tech Times, AI Vortex
Sony Music v. Udio (S.D.N.Y.) Status: Active. Universal and Warner both settled with Udio and exited the litigation in 2025; Sony is the last major still suing. Sony filed a second suit asserting 30,117 additional sound recordings after a judge blocked it from adding them to the original case. Sources: Music Business Worldwide, Billboard
Warner Music Group v. Suno Status: Resolved via settlement + licensing deal. Warner settled its suit against Suno in November 2025 and, in 2026, signed a licensing deal requiring Suno to strip out any model trained on unlicensed material and rebuild on Warner's licensed catalog. Universal and Sony are not part of this deal and continue suing Suno separately. Sources: Music Business Worldwide, Digital Music News
GEMA v. Suno (Germany)
Status: GEMA won. The Munich I Regional Court ruled July 31, 2026 (Case No. 42 O 763/25) that Suno may not reproduce or train on copyrighted works — including "Atemlos" and "Mambo No. 5" without a license. Suno must disclose revenue from the infringing use and pay damages, amount still to be determined. The ruling isn't final; Suno is evaluating an appeal. This is Europe's first AI-music-training ruling and GEMA's second win against an AI company overall. Sources: Music Ally, Forbes, Deadline
Independent artists vs. Suno & Udio (class actions)
Status: Active. Independent artists filed class-action complaints against both platforms in October 2025. Suno's motion-to-dismiss hearing was scheduled for March 20, 2026; both cases remain active with no final ruling yet. Sources: AI Vortex
AFM (musicians' union) v. Universal & Warner
Status: Active, filed June 5, 2026. The American Federation of Musicians is suing Universal and Warner for breach of their collective bargaining agreement, alleging the labels' 2025 licensing settlements with Suno and Udio triggered a "new use" compensation clause the labels never honored — meaning session musicians got no cut or credit when their recordings were licensed to train the AI models. Sources: Billboard, Hollywood Reporter, Music Business Worldwide
Adjacent: music publishers vs. Anthropic (lyrics, not audio)
Not a music-generator case, but close enough to matter for anyone thinking about AI copyright exposure broadly:
Concord / Universal Music Publishing / ABKCO v. Anthropic Status: Active and expanding. Original case filed October 2023 (~500 songs). A second suit filed January 2026 covers over 20,000 songs and seeks $3B+, alleging Anthropic torrented lyrics from pirate "shadow libraries." Publishers filed an amended complaint July 22, 2026, narrowing to direct infringement plus removal of copyright-management information. BMG filed a third, related suit in March 2026 over 493 compositions. Sources: Music Business Worldwide, CelebrityAccess, Music Copyright Infringement Resource
Why this matters for your business
None of these lawsuits are about individual creators — they're about the platforms and, increasingly, about who profits downstream. If your marketing, product, or in-store audio runs on AI-generated or "royalty-free" tracks whose training data is currently being litigated, that exposure doesn't wait for a final ruling to become real. Content ID claims and takedowns are already happening.
This tracker is reviewed weekly. Have a case we missed? Message us via support@soundraw.co.jp and we'll add it.
